Leaders vs. Managers

Leaders vs. Managers
Leadership and management are two separate entities and should be treated as such. This subject has been an ongoing debate in the corporate circles for many years. Some people are born leaders and some are born to manage. Both positions have similar duties such as directing work and influencing people to attain a goal, but have differing character traits for the day-to-day encounters of all players within the organization. This paper will discuss each position separately, and discuss the differences between them and the importance of each. With these comparisons in mind, the paper will also show research that indicates a fewer number of leaders as compared to managers and how that affects the business world. The paper will conclude by restating the idea of leaders and managers being kept as separate jobs within a company to help the business become more successful and prominent.
Manager is a term used to title a formal role in a corporate hierarchy within an organization. A person in this role manages multiple functions, limited resources, and is strained for the demands on his or her time and resources. He or she must use the position for “setting priorities, establishing processes, overseeing the execution of tasks and measuring progress against expectations” (Colvard, 2003). He or she has a solid view of a finished product and systems and procedures to complete the assembly of said product.
Managerial roles include the use of data from information technology departments to utilize their analytical skills and focus on the efficiency of the processes and procedures used for the flow of their department in completion of the finished product. These individuals concentrate on building and implementing changes to the systems and procedures to attempt improvement in functionality of production.
Assembling a cast of subordinates to drive the systems he or she has in place is also the managerial responsibility. A manager’s multitude...