The case that is shown for the capital budgeting case, it shows different expenses, and different revenues. What is reviewed is the revenue that is generated contrasting to the expenses, and that’s earlier than taxes. Both corporation have a notable difference the corporation B had a range between forty to forty two while corporation A had twenty to forty, an remarkable range in comparison. The net income in corporation B was of forty percent while corporation A had fifty six percentages.
But it would an error to check only one financial statement and besides that, not analyze other essential data like net present value, cash flow, internal rate of return and others. Over the 5 years corporation B accomplish 397, 763 and corporation A did 362, 997. With the cash flows establish the present value. Internal rate of return is what is expected to obtain, corporation B had sixteen point nine hundred with forty one percentages in internal rate of return while corporation A had thirteen point fifty two percentages.
The payback season of corporation B is of three point four years, while corporation A is of three point fifty three years. In a summary; the corporation B best because had higher net present value, higher internal rate of investment and in the payback season is just 3.04 years. The corporation B is the corporation that has to be acquired. For those five years the corporation with success is the corporation B.


Meric, I., Dunne, K., Li, S. F., & Meric, G. (2010). VARIETY ENTERPRISES CORPORATION: CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISION.Review of Business & Finance Case Studies, 1(1), 15-20. Retrieved from
  Shapiro, A. C. (1978). Capital budgeting for the multinational corporation. Financial Management (Pre-1986), 7(1), 7. Retrieved from