Welcome to CyberEssays Website

Free Will And Fate In Hamlet And Oedipus Rex

  • Oedipus The King: Free Will Vs Fate
    sins. Therefore the last act of destruction was caused by Oedipus' free will, but his tragic fate came about because of the nature of the cosmic order ( that every...
  • Oedipus; Free Will And Fate
    sins. Therefore the last act of destruction was caused by Oedipus' free will, but his tragic fate came about because of the nature of the cosmic order ( that every...
  • Oedipus Free Will Vs Fate
    Vs. Free Will Fate is responsible for many events, such as the tragedy of Oedipus.   Although some people may lay the fault on others, they were really just part...
  • Oedipus Rex, Hamlet, & Willy Loman Comparison
    comfort of fantasy to the harshness of reality. The tragic characters including Oedipus Rex, Hamlet, and the memorable failure, Willy Loman, serve as living proof...
  • Oedipus Rex Vs Hamlet
    • Perhaps the vivid imagery of poison in Hamlet parallels the curse "in the family blood" in Greek tragedies in Oedipus Rex. • Both plays are written in highly...
  • Submitted by: bleachb
  • Views: 346
  • Category: English
  • Date Submitted: 01/29/2010 03:34 AM
  • Pages: 6

Free Will And Fate In Hamlet And Oedipus Rex

The Classical tragedians appreciated the conflict between fate and free will. At the heart of every great tragedy lies the universal struggle between the human inclination to accept fate absolutely and the natural desire to control destiny. Both Sophocles and Shakespeare would agree that the forces of destiny and choice continually vie for control of human life. Yet, each of these great playwrights espouses a perspective on the struggle born of his specific time and culture. For the Greek Sophocles, fate far overpowers human will; the harder a man works to avoid his fate, the more surely he catapults forth into that very fate. Sophocles' characters ultimately surrender, after resistance, recognition, and reversal, to their destinies; Sophocles' plays warn against the pride that deceives us into believing we can alter fate through human intervention. For Shakespeare — a Christian — the choice between good and evil represents man's basic dilemma; for him, the human will is indomitable. Though fate may ultimately win, a man must fight to the death, if necessary, in order to remain the master of his own choices — choices that ultimately decide if and how his fate defeats him. The contrast between the two points of view is a note-worthy feature of any comparison between Sophocles' Oedipus Rex and Shakespeare's Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.
      In his book The Poetics, Aristotle based the definition of tragedy on Oedipus Rex, making Sophocles' play the archetype of the genre. The notion that a hero must be a man of stature who is undone by some flaw in himself entirely governs Oedipus, the play's protagonist. While Oedipus only nominally controls his life, Hamlet's choices direct and ultimately destroy him. Oedipus, the prototypical Greek tragic hero, can see nothing until he blinds himself, thereby breaking free of the human compulsion to understand forces that one should simply obey. Introspection is only possible for Oedipus when his blindness forces him to stop...