Welcome to CyberEssays Website

14Th Amendment Analysis

  • The 14Th Amendment
    of citizens within the United States that are not fully protected by the 14th amendment? According to the14th amendment, section one, No state shall make or enforce...
  • 14Th Amendment Disenfranchisement Laws
    Kings letter titled Letter from Birmingham Jail, I have an opinion on whether or not the 14th Amendment disenfranchisement laws fit Kings definition of an unjust law...
  • 14Th Amendment -Equal Protection Under The Law
    freedom of press or trial by jury in criminal cases", something that the fourteenth amendment would address. James Madison, one of the Bill of Rights creators knew...
  • 14Th Amendment
    Owning a dog while living in an apartment Most renters do not think that there is anything wrong with owning a dog while living in an apartment. While owning a...
  • First Amendment
    the Bill of Rights, particularly as applied to the States via the 14th amendment , and perhaps a section in the article on the constitution as a whole, or a separate...

14Th Amendment Analysis

Through the use of the Incorporation Doctrine, the United States Supreme Court has held that most, but not all, guarantees of the federal Bill of Rights limit state and local governments as well as the federal government through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.   States have been required to respect freedom of speech, press, and religion, and most of the other guarantees.   Whether the guarantees that are “incorporated” apply to the states just as they apply to the federal government has been the subject of judicial controversy.

Until 1866, the rule, established by the Supreme Court in 1833 in Barron v. Baltimore, was that guarantees of the federal bill of rights limited only the federal government, not state governments.   The Fourteenth Amendment made all persons born in the United States citizens and provided that no state should abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens or deny due process or equal protection to any person.   Although between 1835 and 1866, at the federal level the rights in the Bill of Rights were considered to belong to all American citizens under the Constitution, early cases provided contradictory and inconsistent decisions by the Court as to how the rights in the Bill of Rights would be applied to the states.

In the Slaughterhouse Cases (1873), the Court considered whether Louisiana could grant a monopoly on slaughtering animals.   In ruling for the State, a majority ruled that the Privileges or Immunities Clause did not protect such fundamental rights as the right to labor.   Thus, Slaughterhouse and following cases seemed to deprive the Privileges or Immunities Clause of any significant meaning.   Cases following Slaughterhouse held one after another that the guarantees of the Bill of Rights did not limit the states.   Eventually, though, the Court began to incorporate particular Bill of Rights guarantees selectively as limits on the states.   The Court held that the guarantee that private property would not be...